Arizona Governor Katie Hobbs Strikes Down GOP’s ‘Great’ Gun Bill
Opinion: A bill that would have made it simpler for ranchers to shoot trespassing migrants has been vetoed by Governor Katie Hobbs. Oh my god, is this what we’ve come to?
Republic of Arizona
Gov. Katie Hobbs unexpectedly vetoed a law that would have allowed ranchers to shoot migrants who are crossing their property legally.
Yes, in Arizona, it has truly come to that.
Hobbs vetoed House Bill 2843, stating that “the legislation as written values property over human life and incentivizes vigilantism.”
“The proposal would amend existing laws on self-defense to permit the needless use of lethal force and further strengthen a climate in which violence and armed vigilantism are accepted as normal.”
SEE MORE: Arizona Legislature Moves Forward with Measures to Address ‘Squatter’ Problem
Republicans argue that it’s not open season. Republicans in the legislature, of course, argue that it has nothing to do with opening fire on trespassing migrants.
Don’t pay attention to the rancher from the Nogales area who is currently on trial for second-degree murder in January 2023 after shooting and killing an unarmed migrant who was crossing his 170-acre property.
or to the fact that “Justification; use of physical force in defense of premises” is the title of the measure.
Or the fact that Representative Justin Heap, the bill’s sponsor, stated in February that the goal of his legislation is to safeguard farmers and ranchers because “we are seeing an increasingly larger number of migrants or human traffickers moving across farm and ranchland.”
SEE MORE: Florida Takes Action Now, Legislature Boosts Penalties for Community Association Fraud
By March, Heap had changed his song and was running for Maricopa County recorder. During a Senate hearing on the bill, the Mesa Republican argued, “This has nothing to do with migrants.”
It’s not a smart concept. Trial of Rancher is evidence Heap’s measure appears to be very harmless on paper. The state’s Castle Doctrine, which permits you to use physical force—up to and including lethal force—against someone breaking into your home, is proposed to be expanded.
The potentially legal killing zone would be expanded by Heap’s plan to include anybody who steps foot on your property, even if your residence is only 0.5 miles away. All you would have to do is say that you were defending someone or yourself because you were endangered.
After George Alan Kelly, I guess we could refer to it as George’s Bill.
The 73-year-old rancher from the Nogales area is on trial in Santa Cruz County on charges of aggravated assault and second-degree murder for the death of a migrant who was passing through his property in January 2023.
About a football field away from where Kelly was standing when he fired his AK-47, Gabriel Cuen-Buitimea, 48, a Mexican citizen, was found unarmed and shot dead in the back.
GOP blends: Hatred of immigrants and firearms
According to the prosecution, Cuen-Buitimea was fleeing when he was killed after crossing the border in search of employment.
SEE MORE: DC Recognizes Day Care Staff’s Bravery in Rescuing Children from Anacostia Gas Blast
Kelly claims that after one of the males in the group aimed an assault rifle at him, he fired warning rounds over the heads of the men who were crossing his land.
A legal justification for shooting migrants? Really?
Heap’s bill, of course, was approved on party lines by the Republican-controlled House and Senate.
Rep. Alexander Kolodin, a Republican from Scottsdale, gushed while voting in favor of the bill, saying, “This is a great Second Amendment bill that is also protecting the rights of the accused.”
Is this a “great” bill because it might ultimately result in the death penalty for trespassing on a ranch?
Luckily, Hobbs applied the Castle Doctrine’s Sanity Doctrine, granting Heap’s bill a merciful death.
Making life as terrible as possible for immigrants who enter the nation illegally is one thing, after all.
But providing a legal shield so you can shoot them?
Oh my god, is this what we’ve come to?